Home > Alternative Energy > FRESNEL SOLAR STIRLING ENGINE SUN POWER ALTERNATIVE ENERGY STIRLING MOTOR GENERATOR

FRESNEL SOLAR STIRLING ENGINE SUN POWER ALTERNATIVE ENERGY STIRLING MOTOR GENERATOR

April 7th, 2009

http://www.greenpowerscience.com/ THIS IS ONE OF MY MANY STIRLING ENGINES THAT WAS THE INSPIRATION FOR THE SOLAR STEAM STIRLING HYBRID.

Related posts:

  1. FRESNEL SOLAR STIRLING ENGINE PARABOLIC ALTERNATIVE ENERGY www.greenpowerscience.com Aluminum Bowls as Parabolic Reflectors. Stirling Engine Running...
  2. STIRLING ENGINE SOLAR POWER PARABOLIC MIRROR ELECTRIC GENERATOR www.greenpowerscience.com This is a larger Stirling engine that has...
  3. FREE ENERGY SOLAR POWER STIRLING ENGINE FRESNEL LENS www.greenpowerscience.com This is the first segment of our half-hour...
  4. STIRLING ENGINE FRESNEL LENS SOLAR POWER GREEN ENERGY SUN www.greenpowerscience.com GREEN POWER SCIENCE STIRLING ENGINE AND A FRESNEL...
  5. SOLAR POWER STEAM ENGINE 3 FRESNEL LENS GREENPOWERSCIENCE Two different steam engine powered by the sun. www.greenpowerscience.com...


  1. Barbaricfellow
    January 12th, 2009 at 08:41 | #1

    Likely inventing alternative energy is just the easy part.Beating the mother off all interest called the oil industry(that pretty much owns the military-industrial-media -intelligence complex)to systematically integrate it is the hard part.
    Would be “slightly” naive to assume they’d simply say bye bye to their trillion dollar industry not?

  2. magicalmachines
    January 14th, 2009 at 18:24 | #2

    I discuss the working of the stirling engine on my site, feel free to take a look and point out any mistakes :)

  3. themanyone
    January 22nd, 2009 at 19:40 | #3

    Those always make me smile. I made one cheaply out of tin cans and put it on my channel. Enjoy!

  4. svesolar
    January 25th, 2009 at 22:02 | #4

    I have a heliostat system which cost effective

  5. fascistamericadotnet
    January 26th, 2009 at 22:40 | #5

    the $64,001 question is.. can you transform that motion into electric and store it, and if so can you can you get more energy that way than using solar panels alone?

  6. edstar83
    February 14th, 2009 at 03:49 | #6

    Something like this would be good for recharging solar batteries after a few days of no sun.

  7. masterkang1024
    February 18th, 2009 at 12:45 | #7

    yes, if you can get a city-block sized lens to focus light on to the hot region of the engine. it only worked without the lens for that long because the focused light heated the engine up to an incredible temperature. if you want the engine to run through few days of no sun, not only need a huge lens, you also need some sort of system where you can take the hot region off and store it in a thermo so it can be used later on

  8. masterkang1024
    February 18th, 2009 at 12:48 | #8

    i doubt it. if you cool the engine by rotating a fan, that fan is exerting a resistance to the engine’s motion. what you can do, however, is have heat-pipes to a water supply (preferably running, like stream or river) and cool the “cold” side of the engine. and heat-recycling would be extremely hard. the hottest part is where the heat is applied, and heat only moves away from there, unless u got a heat pump, which still will make it less efficient

  9. masterkang1024
    February 18th, 2009 at 12:52 | #9

    FAIL. guess what, they heat water to super-heated, super compressed state, and push it through a turbine to generate electricity. super heated oil is not as good as water, since water hold more energy per unit mass, and since it is in vapor state, it will give off more energy as it expands and condenses. your oil idea sounds good, but if it worked, it would’ve been done decades ago

  10. EgoTailTRAILCIRCLE
    February 24th, 2009 at 04:43 | #10

    Who can answer that question?
    Very Fascinating idea here maybe a grand solution

  11. profbaldwin
    February 25th, 2009 at 03:47 | #11

    The problem with alternative energy solutions comes down to control and what I call the paradise paradox. Let us suppose that President Obama achieved everything he says he wants to achieve for the US – less dependency on foreign oil, and increased alternative energy sources FOR THE USA. What about Mexico ? Their economy is based on oil, which is depleting fast. I expect huge waves of migration unto the USA, negating the benefits for alt. energy solutions in the years ahead.

  12. GREENPOWERSCIENCE
    February 25th, 2009 at 11:17 | #12

    That does not necessarily explain the last 8 years, highest “migration” ever. I think anything different than the last 8 years is a step in the right direction. Mexico has sun, waves and wind. Boosting their economy with alternative energy possibilities benefits both. Moving away from fossil fuels is the best choice. 100% is not realistic but ever 5% drops in crude demand reduces crude oil prices dramatically.

    Solar can reach remote areas in need.

  13. aaax2tw
    February 26th, 2009 at 02:18 | #13

    how much did you spend for this engine?

  14. Matidios9
    February 28th, 2009 at 10:27 | #14

    actually, just fyi, Mexican immigrations is at its lowest in years and is excepted to turn into migration back into Mexico within the next 2 years.

  15. TheAnalogKid2
    February 28th, 2009 at 22:19 | #15

    Awesome for demostrating the Laws of Thermodynamics. Trucking useless for practical application.

  16. DavidAKZ
    March 3rd, 2009 at 02:16 | #16

    Isn’t it the available torque that can drive a generator the question ?

  17. davidridder74
    March 4th, 2009 at 08:30 | #17

    Any kind of new energy ideas works for me. Search SuperWaveFusion and you will be amazed… A real breakthrough could be happening.

  18. ClockworkHobo
    March 8th, 2009 at 03:02 | #18

    Yep, and this thing isn’t generating enough for practical power generation.

  19. ObiWanShinobi1
    March 10th, 2009 at 12:10 | #19

    another you tube video demonstrating the same thing claims it’s a matter of scale: 30′ gets 30KW

  20. xerochaos187
    March 14th, 2009 at 16:58 | #20

    yep

  21. xerochaos187
    March 14th, 2009 at 16:58 | #21

    hellas

  22. thebadwolf89
    March 28th, 2009 at 11:22 | #22

    this is far from a new idea, andthe big problem about this type of engine is of course how it’s gonna run with no sun.

    If is is a couldy day?
    But i was suprised how long it stored the warm air, and this is a very good alternative to places that has much sun and little clouding, like deserts.

    So all in all a good idea for backup energy but i can power anything real time because of the unstable energysource.

  23. OMGEnterprise
    March 29th, 2009 at 02:29 | #23

    Interesting idea.

    However, In a world which last year consumed a total (from all sources of energy) just over 480 Quadrillion British Thermal Units, it is of little practical use.

    The problem with providing a solution to the world’s dependence on fossil fuels, has always been how you get around the realities of the Laws of Thermodynamics?

    Simply put, you can’t.

    However, if a solution did somehow present itself, how responsible would mankind be with it?

    That is the more important issue.

  24. colamonkey117
    March 29th, 2009 at 18:47 | #24

    how do you think it would run if it stayed in the sun for 5 hours? i think it would run about 3 hours.

  25. onthecuttingedge2005
    April 2nd, 2009 at 17:05 | #25

    if you have to pull or push start it then you are using the wrong engine mechanics, have you tried a turbine instead of a piston?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers