Home > Wind Power > Ecotricity – Bristol Port – Wind Turbine Construction Video

Ecotricity – Bristol Port – Wind Turbine Construction Video

April 14th, 2009

Just launched! Watch our stunning new time-lapse video of the construction of 3 wind turbines at Bristol Port. The turbines will produce over 15 million units of new green electricity annually, enough to save around 13000 tonnes of carbon emissions every year for the next 30 years! www.ecotricity.co.uk

No related posts.


  1. markanthonyartist
    July 9th, 2008 at 17:55 | #1

    outstanding//

  2. windpowerrocks
    July 13th, 2008 at 06:07 | #2

    check out my wind power vids…

  3. sonofhendrix
    July 16th, 2008 at 11:09 | #3

    look how they try to build huge turbines so they can hoard and sell the electricity.
    Build a smaller one in your garden and you can have electricity of your own for FREE!

  4. starwarsgeek8
    July 25th, 2008 at 21:21 | #4

    those things are HUGE! wouldn’t it be better to put up more smaller types, at a similar cost?

  5. Redshift21
    July 29th, 2008 at 08:55 | #5

    According to who you believe the world has reached “peak oil” or will reach it within our lifetimes, energy, goods and services are going to increase in cost unless we bite the bullet and follow a much more aggressive renewable energy policy here in the UK.

  6. bodybager
    August 23rd, 2008 at 02:01 | #6

    Look at this process and ask yourself how much diesel fuel was REQUIRED for the transportation, construction of the footings, and erection of the turbine.

    Now imagine how difficult it would be if it were all done by hand without diesel powered machinery.

    We’d better start using the oil we have left for installation of renewable energy infrastructure because when oil is $1000 per barrel (and that day will come within 20 years), these turbines will be VERY EXPENSIVE to install!

  7. ecotricity
    September 17th, 2008 at 08:43 | #7

    Nope – not if we were to use electricity generated from existing turbines rather than oil ;-)

  8. visionscope50
    October 10th, 2008 at 07:55 | #8

    I see trucks hauling blades alot lately down the roads.

  9. scudlington
    November 17th, 2008 at 03:30 | #9

    Saving 13000 tons of evil carbon every year…Sounds impressive and scary at the same time. What? 13000 tons of gas? that must be like half the worlds atmosphere or something. In reality though it is utterly insignificant. Human breath alone accounts for approx’ 6 MILLION tons every DAY. We are not told the truth about windmills and most other supposedly ‘green’ methods of power generation. They are products of a new political agenda that is going to cost us way more than we can afford…

  10. scudlington
    November 17th, 2008 at 03:55 | #10

    The interesting thing is that our government knows this but because the debate about ‘climate change’ is now apparently over, our great Scottish leader and his henchmen now feel they have a vote winning opportunity to commit the country to what will eventually prove to be a catastrophically expensive act of vandalism to our beautiful countryside. Most do not realise that this is one of the main factors behind our ever increasing energy bills. It is never reported by the BBC or seldomly discussed

  11. scudlington
    November 17th, 2008 at 04:20 | #11

    …sorry to go on…because the ‘consensus’ is that everyone agrees that we are now somehow in charge of the worlds weather. Clearly bananas but to governments and certain sectors of private enterprise a money making opportunity made in heaven. That old chestnut ‘they’ll tax us for the air we breathe’ is already with us. My families last electricity bill was 30% higher than it should have been. 30% on top of excessive profiteering on a necessity by a nifty little EU directive called the RO

  12. scudlington
    November 17th, 2008 at 04:37 | #12

    (Renewables obligation). This states that each provider must generate a certain percentage of their electricity mainly by the above means. They can’t, because even though we are now in charge of the weather we still can’t make the wind blow when we need it, consequently they are fined (taxed) and dutifully pass this on in full to us mugs…marvellous. This is all now set to get far worse. A couple of months ago Gordo triumphantly announced that he was going to save the world by spending…

  13. scudlington
    November 17th, 2008 at 05:31 | #13

    Just one more thing before I get off me soap box. I’m not ‘anti environment’ or do I like to be labelled a ‘denier’ (as if we were somehow back in the days of the Spanish inquisition.) Nothing depresses me more than the destruction of our natural habitat, (particularly the great rainforests) but if you really believe that building windmills will somehow help the polar bears or prevent New York being 20ft under then you really are living in cloud cuckoo land.

  14. jeskao3
    November 24th, 2008 at 09:08 | #14

    this is one sign of how amazing the world is going to coming together to bring new energy resources in to power lines, to help off set our carbon output. Just as much fuel is used to bring all that smelly coal with it needs to go to produce power, stop thinking so far inside the box, invest in something that will last for longer than the short sighted foreseeable future we all like to live in

  15. scudlington
    December 4th, 2008 at 13:49 | #15

    Jeskao I have to say that you are right. It is ‘just a sign’ some would even say symbolic. National grids, all essentially work to the same principal of balance…demand/supply. These ‘green’ techs do not and cannot address this issue because they have no control over the power source. The largest of WTs will supply less power than the battery in my watch when the wind isn’t blowing and therefore must be backed up at all times. You must think about these issues minus green tinted lenses.

  16. scudlington
    December 20th, 2008 at 18:47 | #16

    Excellent! I look forward to it.

  17. buzharley
    December 30th, 2008 at 12:50 | #17

    Noone is saying that wind turbines are the answer. It’s just part of the answer. I also admit that there are problems with it like ’scudlington’ said. In fact the turbines actually use a small amount of energy when there isn’t any wind. However wind turbines recover the energy used to manufacture, install, and run them after only 4 or 5 months. Coal plants never achieve this. So, WTs have flaws but they are greatly overshadowed by the benefits of putting them up.

  18. soylentgreenb
    January 7th, 2009 at 18:42 | #18

    “However wind turbines recover the energy used to manufacture, install, and run them after only 4 or 5 months.”

    Who cares?

    A significant fraction is simply flushed down the toilet(offpeak, coal plants don’t shut down) or eaten up by spinning reserve. For each kWh of wind power you need 1-2 kWh of natural gas; NG is expensive and difficult to transport.

    The grid is not a “bank”, hell, it’s not even a connected graph. Transmission, not generation, is the hard part and wind makes it much worse.

  19. windmillman101
    January 20th, 2009 at 21:41 | #19

    I love the music!nice video!

  20. RehmanAbubakr
    February 12th, 2009 at 05:44 | #20

    Not bad, not bad. Seriously. Very nice.

  21. acavideo
    February 14th, 2009 at 15:45 | #21

    If these industrial monsters must be installed, it’s best to do it an already industrialized area, not on pristine or rural land.

    But most of them are going up wherever wind patterns see fit. There’s nothing “green” about their affect on the landscape. More like white, cold and evil-looking in many cases.

  22. darkpheonix262
    February 22nd, 2009 at 21:11 | #22

    cool vid, you should check out mine. its a turbine construction at Mesalands Community College in Tucumcari NM, tallest class room in the world

  23. esportosa
    March 19th, 2009 at 13:04 | #23

    Wow! Awsome video!!

  24. 54spiritedwill54
    March 25th, 2009 at 03:29 | #24

    amazing ! Those things are freaking huge!

  25. keropberberian
    April 11th, 2009 at 15:05 | #25

    i love u guys

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers